Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy ; 17(1): 61, 2022 08 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35999633

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Appointment no-show and early dropout from treatment represent major challenges in outpatient substance use disorder treatment, adversely affecting clinical outcomes and health care productivity. In this quasi-experimental study, we examined how a brief reminder intervention for new patients before their first appointment affected treatment participation and retention. No-shows (not attending any sessions) and dropouts (discontinuation of initiated treatment because of three consecutively missed appointments) were compared between a period with pre-admission telephone calls (intervention) and a period without such reminders (non-intervention). METHODS: Participants were all eligible patients (N = 262) admitted to a Norwegian specialist clinic for substance use disorder treatment. We used the Chi-square test for the no-show analysis. Of the eligible patients, 147 were included in a subsequent dropout analysis. We used the number of visits up to 10 appointments as a measure for time to event. Group differences were analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier plot and the log-rank test. To control for relevant sociodemographic variables, as well as substance use and mental distress severity, we used Cox regression. RESULTS: No-show rates did not differ between the two periods (12% for non-intervention vs. 14% for intervention; χ2 = 0.20, p = 0.653). Of those consenting to participate in the dropout analysis (n = 147), 28 (19%) discontinued treatment within the time frame of 10 appointments, with no differences between the two periods (log-rank test = 0.328, p = 0.567). Controlling for baseline characteristics did not alter this finding. In fact, of the registered covariates at baseline, only higher education level was associated with attrition, linked to a reduced risk for dropout (hazard ratio = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.74-0.98, p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: These findings do not provide support for the systematic use of a brief pre-admission telephone reminder in the current treatment setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered 13 Jan 2021 at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04707599.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Alerta , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Telefone , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Agendamento de Consultas , Humanos , Pacientes não Comparecentes/estatística & dados numéricos , Noruega , Pacientes Desistentes do Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/terapia
2.
J Psychiatry Neurosci ; 47(3): E222-E229, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35705204

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Infralow neurofeedback (ILF-NF) was recently developed as a subtype of traditional, frequency-based neurofeedback that targets cerebral rhythmic activity below 0.5 Hz and improves brain self-regulation. The efficacy of ILF-NF in the treatment of substance use disorder has not yet been evaluated, but clinical evidence suggests that it may prevent relapse by improving functioning in various life domains. The current study aimed to fill this research gap and extend empirical evidence related to this issue. METHODS: Ninety-three patients with substance use disorders at an outpatient unit in Norway were randomized to receive 20 sessions (30 minutes each) of ILF-NF training combined with treatment as usual (TAU), or TAU alone. The primary outcome was quality of life post-treatment as an overall measure of functioning. We analyzed between-group differences using Student t tests. RESULTS: We found no significant differences in quality of life between groups. We found similar nonsignificant results for most of the secondary outcome measures, including drug use, sleep, anxiety and depression. Compared to TAU, the ILF-NF + TAU group reported significantly lower restlessness scores post-treatment (mean difference -1.8, 95 % confidence interval -3.1 to -0.5; p = 0.006).Limitations: This study was limited by broad inclusion criteria and a lack of placebo control (sham neurofeedback treatment). CONCLUSION: ILF-NF offered limited additional benefit when combined with TAU, except in the area of restlessness. Future studies could further investigate the relationship between ILF-NF, restlessness and substance use in targeted subpopulations to illuminate relapse mechanisms. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03356210.


Assuntos
Neurorretroalimentação , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Humanos , Neurorretroalimentação/métodos , Agitação Psicomotora , Qualidade de Vida , Recidiva , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...